@article{Riha_2016, place={Ljubljana, Slovenija}, title={The Transcendental Subject and its Dawider}, volume={36}, url={https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4522}, abstractNote={The aim of this essay is to provide an answer to the question of knowing whether it is possible to find in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason a figure of the subject that would not be solely reduced to a function in the constitution of the object. Is Kant’s “Copernican turn” truly a turn towards the subject or is it rather simply a detailed elaboration of the theory of the object, a theory with two voids: the void of the transcendental subject and the void of the transcendental object? The answer elaborated in this essay is the following: in the first Critique there is indeed a figure of the subject that is not solely the subject of the object, but is rather the subject for which the object is not only a vis-à-vis but also a part thereof, although a constitutively subtracted part. While this curious object, which the author proposes to call a trans-empirical, makes the constitution of the subject possible, it remains for the latter something that is radically Dawider.}, number={2}, journal={Filozofski vestnik}, author={Riha, Rado}, year={2016}, month={Mar.} }